China's
intellectual property legislation stipulates
that infringement of intellectual property
rights (IPRs) are dealt with by
administrative procedures and legal
proceedings. In terms of civil liabilities,
the infringer may be ordered to stop the
infringing act, eradicate the damage done,
make public apologies or compensate for
damages. In terms of administrative measures
and criminal liabilities, they include
warnings, orders to stop the infringing act,
confiscation of unlawful gains, fines, and
compensation for damages.
When an IPR infringement dispute arises,
the interested parties may resort to
mediation. If mediation is not a preferred
option, or mediation has failed, or one of
the interested parties refuses to abide by
the outcome of mediation, legal proceedings
may be instituted with the people's court.
The interested parties may also request the
relevant administrative authorities for
actions.
8.3.1 Legal Proceedings
When an IPR infringement dispute arises,
the infringed party may institute legal
proceedings directly with the people's court
at the place of the infringer's domicile or
where the infringing act takes place.
Under China's current judicial system,
intermediate people's courts are courts of
first instance for patent infringement
cases. Civil cases involving copyright are
dealt with by people's courts at above
intermediate level. High people's courts
can, based on the actual circumstances in
the districts under their respective
jurisdiction, assign people's courts at
lower levels to handle first hearings of
civil cases involving copyright disputes.
If an interested party finds that due to
emergency circumstances any delay to stop
the infringing act may cause irreparable
damages to his legitimate rights, he may,
before instituting legal proceedings,
request the people's court to freeze the
assets of the infringer.
In handling IPR infringement cases, the
people's court will see to it that the
infringer, if convicted, is made to bear
civil liabilities for the infringing act.
Where the case is so serious as to
constitute a crime, the infringer will be
prosecuted for his criminal liabilities.
8.3.2 Administrative Procedures
China currently adopts a dual-track
system for IPR protection under which the
interested parties may seek to resolve
IPR-related disputes through administrative
procedures or legal proceedings. When an IPR
infringement dispute arises, the interested
party may request the relevant
administrative authorities at county-level
and above at the place of the infringer's
domicile or where the infringing act takes
place to handle the case.
It should be noted that under China's
Patent Law and Trademark Law, foreign
enterprises are required to appoint
designated agents to handle matters related
to patents and trademarks. This also applies
to the handling of disputes involving
infringements, which means that the
designated agent should make the request for
settlement of the dispute on behalf of the
interested party.
(a) Information and Proof to be
Submitted
In making a request for the
administrative authorities to handle an
infringement dispute, the interested party
should submit a written request, proof of
his right, and evidence of the infringing
act. If an agent is appointed to submit the
request, an authorisation letter should also
be furnished.
For cases involving the protection of
trademarks under the grace period for
renewal, the complainant should provide
proof of application for renewal.
(b) Processing by Administrative
Authorities
The administrative authorities
responsible for handling copyright disputes
will make a decision whether a complaint
will be processed within 15 days upon
receipt of the request and inform the
applicant of its decision. A written
explanation will be given to the applicant
if the decision is negative.
The administrative authorities
responsible for handling patent disputes
will, after examining a request, make a
decision whether the complaint will be
processed within seven days upon receipt of
the request. If the decision is negative,
the applicant will be given a written
explanation within seven days.
(c) Calculation of Compensation
The competent administrative authorities
may order the infringer to pay for damages
based on the request of the applicant.
The amount of compensation for infringing
a copyright is calculated according to the
direct damages caused by the infringement
and reasonable fees incurred by the
copyright holder in investigating and
stopping the infringing act.
The amount of compensation for infringing
a trademark is calculated based on the
profits earned by the infringer through the
infringement during the infringement period
or the damages suffered by the infringed
party during the infringement period.
The amount of compensation for infringing
a patent is calculated according to the
damages suffered by the patentee or the
profits earned by the infringer through the
infringement. Where it is difficult to
determine the damages suffered by the
patentee or the profits earned by the
infringer, the amount of royalty for the
patent may be used as the base for
calculation.
(d) Dissatisfaction with
Administrative Punishment Decisions
Where an interested party is
dissatisfied with the administrative
punishment decision made by the
administrative authorities, he may,
within three months from receipt of the
notification of the decision, institute
administrative proceedings with the
people's court in the place where the
administrative authorities are located.
If no proceedings are instituted and the
decision is not performed at the
expiration of the specified period, the
administrative authorities may request
the people's court for compulsory
execution thereof.
Where an interested party is
dissatisfied with the administrative
punishment decision, he may, within 15
days from receipt of the notification of
the decision, apply to the local
people's government or the
administrative authorities at a higher
level for reconsideration of the
decision. In this case, the interested
party should submit a written request
for reconsideration.
The authorities concerned should
decide within 10 days whether to handle
the case. If positive, a decision on the
reconsideration should be made within
two months from receipt of the
application for reconsideration. If the
interested party is dissatisfied with
the decision on the reconsideration, he
may, within 15 days from receipt of the
notification of the decision, institute
administrative proceedings with the
people's court. If no proceedings are
instituted and the decision is not
performed at the expiration of the
specified period, the administrative
authorities concerned may request the
people's court for compulsory execution
thereof.
Upon the request of the complainant,
the industry and commerce administration
departments may register and keep or
seal and keep the evidence submitted,
and may request the complainant to
provide the corresponding guarantee
according to law.
If, in the process of investigating
infringement cases, there is any case
found to be so serious as to constitute
a crime, the administrative authorities
concerned should refer it to the
judicial organ.
8.3.3 Disputes over Intellectual
Property Contracts
When a dispute over an intellectual
property contract arises, the interested
parties may resort to mediation. If
mediation is not a preferred option, or
mediation has failed, or one of the
interested parties refuses to abide by the
outcome of mediation, legal proceedings may
be instituted with the people's court at the
place of the defendant's domicile or where
the contract is executed.
In addition to the above options,
disputes over intellectual property
contracts may also be resolved in accordance
with the provisions for arbitration
stipulated in the contract or with any
subsequent supplemental written arbitration
agreement reached. In these cases,
application should be made to an arbitration
organ for arbitration. For patent contracts,
application should be made to economic
contract arbitration organs or technical
contract arbitration organs. For copyright
contracts, application should be made to the
Copyright Contract Arbitration Committee.
The interested parties should abide by
the ruling of arbitration. If one of the
parties fails to comply with the decision,
the other party may apply to the people's
court for compulsory execution thereof. If
the people's court handling the case finds
that the format of the arbitration ruling
does not conform to the law, it may refuse
to order its execution. In such
circumstances, the interested party may take
the contract dispute case to the people's
court for litigation.